Swedish Politicians, Judges and Journalists discussed in Swedens Supreme Court

Till: Högsta Domstolen i Sverige

Svea Hovrätt

Birger Jarls Torg 16

103 17 Stockholm

To: Swedens Supreme Court Copy: European Court of Human Rights

C/O Svea Hovrätt Registry of the Court

Birger Jarls Torg 16 Council of Europe

103 17 Stockholm 1 avenue de l´Europe

67075 Strasbourg Cedex

FRANCE

Överklagan av Svea Hovrätts dom i mål nr. Ö 14618-25

Appeal against legal judgement of Svea Appeal Court in court case no. Ö 14618-25

Överklagandet i korthet:

Klagande är Thomas G.A. Jackson, Leeds, XXXXXXXXX, UK. Email är : XXXXXXXX telefonnummer XXXXXX
Avgörande som överklagas är beslut av Svea Hovrätt, avdelning 7 daterat 2025-12-19 med målnummer Ö 14618-25
Klagande önskar ändra hovrättens beslut att avslå klagandes överklagande till att ge bifall till klagandes yrkande att tre av målsägaren inkallade vittnen skall höras. Klagande menar att domvilla enligt 59 kap. rättegångsbalken föreligger. Det handlar om allvarliga fel i själva rättegångsförfarandet, som att en part inte blivit hörd, domen är otydlig och att det funnits jäv hos jurydomare. Klagande menar att Stockholms Tingsrätts beslut att neka målsägande vittnen, att Tingrätten icke tydligt motiverar det beslutet och att det tveklöst förhåller sig så att den politiska juryn i denna unika rättssak är jävig, vänligen se alla handlingar i målet som tillsändes Högsta Domstolen. Klagande kommer kontrollera att samtliga handlingar kommit HD tillhanda.
Vänligen se överklagan till hovrätten med skäl klagande anför för att hovrättens avgörande skall ändras.
Högsta domstolen bör ge prövningstillstånd i detta mål då en växande skara bland allmänhet, journalister och läkare anser OCH bevismedel tydligt visar att SVT/SR spridit en villfarelse över riket när SVT/SR farit med en total och explicit osanning om, och politiserat/framställt som nazism, klagandes syn på flyktingbarn vilket i sin tur påverkat forskning vid svenska universitet och medicinska högskolor vilket i sin tur orsakat en mänsklig tragedi, med 1000-tals barn som offer, som t.o.m. spridits internationellt via mediala copycatmekanismer.

Klagande åberopar de bevis som föreligger i målets handlingar där det i åberopade bevismedel ostridigt och explicit framgår att klagandens medicinska bedömning av apatiska barn med resignationssyndrom är att de är utsatta för svåra övergrepp. Endast en utpräglat illvillig, korrupt, lögnaktig, falsk person med uppsåt att ljuga eller person med psykopatiska komponenter i sin personlighet kan förneka detta.

Lika ostridigt och explicit framgår av bevisen att tilltalad ansvarig utgivare Klas Wolf-Watz vid Sveriges Radio framställer klagandens medicinska bedömning som nazistisk och att ”barnen låtsas vara sjuka” vilket icke bara är lögnaktigt och grovt förtal av icke bara klagande utan även av personer ansvariga för SOU 2006:49 som ansåg klagandens medicinska åsikt såsom relevant för den tragiska epidemin av apati/resignation hos asylsökande flyktingbarn i Sverige. Dessutom bedrar Klas Wolf-Watz svensk allmänhet om det väsentliga och för saken centrala sakförhållandet vad klagande och SOU 2006:49 egentligen framfört i utredningen vilket enkelt kan konstateras i talans bevismedel sida 26 i SOU 2006:49. Ett bedrägeri som i sig de facto stimulerade till fortsatta övergrepp på 1000-tals flyktingbarn fram till år 2019 när Magasinet Filter presenterade en utförlig dokumentär artikel där deras journalister intervjuat nu unga vuxna som tidigare varit s.k. apatiska barn som berättade vilka oerhörda och plågsamma övergrepp de utsattes för av vårdnadshavare och svensk sjukvård vilket är i överensstämmande med det SOU 2006:49 larmade om på sida 26.

Sektion 1 nedom är på svenska / Section 1 below is in Swedish

Sektion 2 nedom är på engelska/ Section 2 below is in English

Introduction and explanation just in English why this dichotomy in two sections:

Section 2 consists of information to ECHR that a very important and complicated legal dispute ”Jackson against Sweden” is in preparation. IF the truth comes out consequences probably might be enormous and unpredictable for Sweden e.g. Karolinska Institute might be named and shamed. The truth will probably not come out in major media as it should – this court case will probably just be whispered about. The main function of the coming appeal to ECHR is that it hopefully will bring some attention to this incredible sad story and be published in as many minor media as possible. The function of this legal dispute might be, which we dont know yet, to illustrate that courts and judges dont want to understand that a single doctor might be right against a whole nation. A nation that supposedly had good intentions but got totally lost when journalistic political correctness branded a state investigation SOU 2006:49 as xenophobic.

This case as mentioned above might be regarded as a very important case, that after its dismissal in Swedens Supreme Court, the applicant urges should be referred to the Grand Chamber at ECHR this as Sweden has breached several articles related to Substantive Rights like Article 3 Prohibition of torture, Article 4 Prohibition of slavery, Article 6 Right to a fair trial, Article 10 Freedom of expression, Article 13 Right to an effective remedy, Article 14 Prohibition of discrimination.

Nota Bene: These breaches explain why the unique Swedish copycat epidemic and traumatization of thousands of refugee children returned the fall of 2006 after it had disappeared the spring of 2006.

The epidemic returned fall of 2006 after Swedish State Television September 2006 spread a false narrative that rightwing extremism and xenophobia were behind the conclusion of the state investigation that refugee children were just ”acting” ill. This started a stampede against all whistleblowers and people that tried to raise concern.

But the state investigation in fact never proclaimed refugee children were ”acting”.

The state investigation SOU 2006:49 on page 26 proclaimed that the children were in a malingering by proxy situation which sadly Swedish State Television and Swedish Radio then published as ”the State Investigations conclusion was that children were just acting ill.”

And of course this started an exceptionell decade long public rage against the state investigation including myself whom the state investigation referred to as an expert.

Everyone understood children cannot act ill like this. Sadly the malingering by proxy situation was totally overlooked by Swedish media that publically discussed just their own false misinterpretation of ”acting children” and still to this very day 17th January 2026 the tragedy seems to continue in hidden numbers as the Swedish State authorities still deny the existence of child abuse in this for the world historically unique epidemic.

The Swedish State still this very day denies maltreatment and medical negligence in this tragic epidemic even though some brave pediatricians fully and Swedish Association of Journalism halfheartedly to some extent have admitted their failure to report objectively about this severe medical abuse. Swedish Doctors Associations Board has clearly stated that there is nothing wrong or xenophobic about discussing Induced or Fabricated Illness in Children or Group Malingering by Proxy related to the epidemic. But Swedish State Authorities like National Board of Health and Welfare and the world famous Karolinska Institutet that select Nobel Prize winners in medicine still deny any wrongdoings and cling on to the pseudodiagnosis ICD-10 F32.3A THEY INVENTED just to protect themselves. The letter A means that the diagnos is unique and is not discussed anywhere else in the world.

In fact, on my doctors word on honour, these two institutions describe the sequalae of long term severe child abuse as an illness. I find this disgusting and unworthy of any society or nation.

I therefor already now send a copy of this courtcase to ECHR to later be followed up with an appeal and application after Swedens Supreme Court has dismissed this appeal.

So, In section 1 below you find an appeal in Swedish aimed just for the Swedish Supreme Court – I dont translate this unless ECHR later so asks me to do.

In section 2 below you find the background in English.

I humbly reject any legal officer from Sweden to take part in the coming legal process at EHCR.

”Holy Cows never die – they just fade away” is a paraphrase of ”Old Soldiers never die, they just fade away” coming from the famous saying by General Douglas MacArthur in his 1951 farewell address to the Congress. I believe this will be the case for Swedens Holy Cow Fake Narrative about the cruel epidemic – it will never die but just fade away. Likewise tortured children victims of the false narrative will in a way like old soldiers never die, their tragic fate and destiny will be remembered, but overall they will just fade away.”

My application/appeal to ECHR willl be sent a.s.a.p. after Swedens Supreme Court has dismissed this appeal.

***************************************************************************

Sektion 1

Undertecknad målsägare överklagar härmed Svea Hovrätts beslut enligt aktbilaga 7 i mål nr Ö 14618-25 i följande avseende:

Jag finner Svea Hovrätts aktbilaga 7 i ärendet torftig, onyanserad och juridiskt medioker då Svea Hovrätt ej berättar varför målsägande Thomas Jackson återkallade sin talan vid Stockholms Tingsrätt. Återkallelsen föranleddes nämligen av Stockholms Tingsrätts beslut att icke tillåta vittnen. Detta beslut går emot juridisk praxis att i första rättsinstans tillåta vittnen och det går emot den rättsprocessuella ordningen som förevarit i två tidigare mål nämligen

B 15812-16 och B 6490-23 där min talan varit exakt densamma nämligen att jag grovt felciterats av Aftonbladet respektive Sveriges Television. De tre vittnen jag inkallat denna gång i målet där beslut/dom härmed överklagas utgjordes av a. en universitetsprofessor i arkivhistoria från Oslo Universitet som skulle vittna om hur avpublicering från internet av den artikel jag författade och SOU 2006:49 refererade till försvårar forskningen bl.a. på apatiska barnepidemin i Sverige, b. en nuvarande generaldirektör och forskningsansvarig för SOU 2006:49 som skulle vittna om att termen på utredningens sida 26 ”Group malingering by proxy” innebär att barnen medicinskt misshandlas och ej att barnen ”låtsas” vilket tilltalad påstår, c. en expertläkare och forskare på apatiska barn epidemin som i forskningsrapport påtalat att barn i Sveriges apatiska barnepidemi medicinskt misshandlas i en Malingering by Proxy situation.

Dessa tre vittnen med högsta relevans för målsägandens talan har både Stockholms Tingsrätt och Svea Hovrätt fräckheten, oförståndet och faktiskt mot de utsatta barnen grymheten att avvisa. Om sanningen skulle komma fram till allmänheten att SOU 2006:49 redan år 2006 varnade för medicinska övergrepp och icke påstod att ”barnen låtsas” så skulle barnen få upprättelse och forskningen inom Medical Child Abuse som anses vara en pionjärfront inom medicinsk forskning skulle vinna ny terräng och kunna förhindra framtida medicinska övergrepp på barn. Stockholms Tingsrätts lagman och rådman inklusive Svea Hovrätts i mina ögon mediokra och amoraliska s.k. Hovrättspresident Mari Heidenborg som är mycket väl införstådd i övergreppen sedan sin tid som Justitiekansler kommer att JO-anmälas.

Jag önskar i sammanhanget påpeka att Sveriges jurister/domare och advokater har i de fyra rättsprocesser jag drivit för barnens skull visat sig vara, i ordens reella innebörd så in i helvete korkade, att de tror jag driver dessa åtal för min egen del. JAG DRIVER DEM I FÖRSTA HAND FÖR BARNENS SKULL och för forskning om Medical Child Abuse vilket är mycket svårt att bedriva medicinsk forskning om eftersom Medical Child Abuse är ett brott och ej en sjukdom. Läkare och sjukhuschefer som blir lurade att delta i Medical Child Abuse där ett barn svårt traumatiseras eller t.o.m. dör vill naturligtvis ej initiera forskning som kan leda till att de blir av med sina legitimationer eller hamnar i fängelse. Hela Sveriges hållning i denna problematik är helt uppåt väggarna – men sååå typiskt svenskt.

YRKANDE: Målsägande yrkar att Högsta Domstolen skall undanröja Stockholms Tingsrätt beslut, och Svea Hovrätts gillande, att icke tillåta de tre vittnen målsägande önskar inkalla.

Punkt ett ovan gäller alltså att första instans och andra rättsinstans avvisar vittnen som har relevans för målets utgång. Jag tror faktiskt domare och advokater vill avvisa åberopade vittnen för att de är rädda för att deras karriärer lider skada OM denna oerhörda medicinska skandal briserar nationellt och internationellt. En skandal där svenska politiker med skattemedel under två decennier använt miljarder kronor som stimulerat till att fortsätta med grov barntortyr inom offentligt finansierad sjukvård. Denna punkt två är kopplad till just detta att skattemedel har bekostat medicinsk barntortyr. Målsägande har nämligen explicit till tingsrätt och hovrätt redogjort för att en politisk niomannajury som frikänt tilltalade i B 15812-16 och B 6490-23 och som varit tilltänkt som jury i det mål som härmed överklagas mot ovan skall anses som ostridigt jävig och att detta utgör ett tydligt rättegångshinder.

Varför skall då denna politiska jury betraktas som jävig? Svaret är självklart det att i apatiska barnepidemin som pågick över två decennier i Sverige har politiker på samtliga politiska nivåer och politiskt tillsatta tjänstemän yttersta ansvaret för t.ex. att via Förvaltningstiftelsen utse de för Public Service ytterst ansvariga personer som producerar samhällsinformation till allmänheten. Alltså ansvar för att utse styrelse för SVT/SR som utser verkställande direktör vid SVT/SR som i sin tur utsett de ansvariga utgivare som felciterat SOU 2006:49. Politiker ansvarar även för tillsättning av rektorer vid Karolinska Institutet och för den forskning som sker där och politiker ansvarar tillika för samtlig offentlig forskning vid universitet och medicinska högskolor i Sverige vars forskning varit så pass undermålig att den icke endast medverkat i grov medicinsk barnmisshandel utan tillika dolt grov barnmisshandel under en bluffdiagnos ICD-10 F32.3A. SBU – Statens Beredning för medicinsk utvärdering – har senare påvisat underlag saknas för diagnosen.

Det torde vara svårt att föreställa sig en större skandal än denna. Det torde även vara självklart för var tänkande person att den politiskt utsedda juryn är jävig när den dömer i en sak där om målsägaren får rätt och tilltalad döms hela Sveriges politiska etablissemang skandaliseras.

Yrkande: Målsägande yrkar att Högsta Domstolen gillar att Stockholms Tingsrätts politiska jury i denna sak skall anses som jävig, att detta jäv utgör ett rättegångshinder och att prövningstillstånd ges för att skapa prejudikat i detta exceptionella mål där målsägaren yrkar att Högsta domstolen undanröjer Tingsrättens och Hovrättens domar och att rättegången görs om vid Stockholms Tingsrätt icke med tryckfrihetsjury som är att se som jävig utan med sedvanlig domstol i form av domare och nämndemän. ELLER att Högsta Domstolen själv dömer i denna unika och exceptionella rättssak alternativt medverkar till förlikning mellan parterna där målsägande yrkar ersättning för sina rättegångskostnader, att i förlikning överenskommes om att tilltalad lägger in förklarande text parterna överenskommer om jämte de förtalsgrundande internetpubliceringarna och att tilltalad döms att betala målsägande ett rimligt ideellt skadestånd som skall stå i proportion till den skada tilltalads yttrandefrihetsbrott orsakat målsägande.

Jag bryr mig inte så mycket om de rättegångskostnader Stockholms Tingsrätt dömt mig betala. Så om Sveriges Högsta Domstol och i denna sak sannolikt allmänt vilsna justitieråd ej undanröjer domen att jag skall betala rättegångskostnaderna så anser jag det i linje med domstolsverkets förfall . Ty det är på något sätt kulmen i dagens vilsna Sverige som i denna sak uppenbarligen lider av generellt låg-IQ och kunskapsbrist; att de som vill skydda extra sårbara barn från medicinska övergrepp och som påtalar att miljardbelopp av skattemedel har använts till i vissa fall årslånga
perioder av grov medicinsk barntortyr – som gör att extra sårbara flyktingbarn dissocierar och blir katatona av brinnande ångest så svår att få kan föreställa sig – skall tvingas betala för att påpeka barnövergrepp som i de grövsta fallen utan tvekan kan kallas Auschwitz 2.0.

Barn som befinner sig i dessa Malingering by Proxy situationer, beskrivs enligt Oxford Universitys bok ”Malingering and Illness Deception” av Halligan/Bass i specialkapitlet av Judith Libow om tvångssimulering av barn, uttrycker en förtvivlan över att mannen i den vita rocken inte förstår vad som sker. Exakt samma sak beskriver journalisten och författaren Ola Sandstig i boken ”De apatiska barnen – och samhället som svek” att de svenska apatiska barnen berättat att ”de måste ha förstått vad som pågick men de gjorde inget för att skydda oss”.

Yrkande: Jag återkallar yrkandet att domen om rättegångskostnader, som den i denna rättssak moraliskt mediokra Stockholms Tingsrätt dömt mig att betala, skall ogillas. Alltså domen avseende rättegångskostnader till en i denna sak moraliskt avskyvärd Public Service och en i denna sak lika moraliskt avskyvärd advokat skall gälla.

Kom igen bara! Ni usla jurister, korrupta advokater, journalister och politiker. Säg till den i denna sak empatilösa, korrupta barnövergreppstimulerande advokaten Peter Danowsky att han skall öka sina rättegångskostnader till 10.000.000 SEK. Jag accepterar härmed detta belopp. Jag hoppas innerligt Sveriges Högsta Domstol ändrar hans rättegångskostnader från 175.000 SEK till 10.000.000 SEK ty det måste ha varit väldigt psykiskt jobbigt för honom att yrka att Stockholms Tingsrätt skulle neka tillträde till rättssalen för de tre vittnen vars vittnesmål kunnat ge drabbade barn upprättelse och skydda barn från framtida övergrepp.

Avslutningsvis vill jag be om ursäkt för att mitt språk ovan stundom är hårt. De hårda orden skrivs dock med avsikten att väcka det svenska samhället till liv från en kollektiv hysteri med tunnelseende som medfört blindhet inför de oerhörda medicinska övergrepp som drabbat 1000-tals oskyldiga asylsökande flyktingbarn. Att jag som visselblåsare dessutom beskrivs som nazist och högerextrem gör mig inget eftersom detta illustrerar vilka galningar som bedriver journalistik i Sverige. Så det bjuder jag på. Däremot kan jag ej acceptera den enorma journalistiska amatörism hos svensk public service och hos riksmedia att de ej tycks ha förstått att om man kallar en erfaren läkare, som arbetar som specialistläkare i Storbritannien och som från sin tjänstgöring därstädes kan speciallitteraturen om medicinska övergrepp mot barn, att om public service offentliggör att denne visselblåsaren är högerextrem och nazist så är det ingen som lyssnar på honom och gör, och de facto gjorde, att övergreppen kunde och kan fortsätta.

Leeds/UK 17 januari 2026

Thomas GA Jackson, målsägande.

Sektion två se nedan!

Sektion 2

I Dr Thomas G.A. Jackson MD, PhD, director and professor of Clinical and Encyclopedic Psychiatry at Evidence Based Psychiatry LTD est. 2004, Leeds, UK who is the applicant insist that this case should be registered and assigned by the Court Registry to a Chamber the President of which will appoint a judge rapporteur (referent).

I am though willing for a friendly settlement on certain conditions like

A. It must på openly acknowledged that some children, perhaps all, could have been victims of a malingering by proxy situation that included enormous suffering which explains some of the childrens catathonic states and extreme levels of stress hormones.

B. The Swedish State shall ask the children for an indiscriminate apology, giving them rectification, paying them damage for medical negligence and psychological and medical help for free as long is it takes.

C. I also believe I personally according to Article 41 regarding ”Just satisfaction” should recieve financial compensation to a reasonable degree to cover my legal costs and other costs. However I am willing to ignore this condition if A. and B. above is fulfilled.

Background:

I kindly ask Swedens Supreme Court and European Court of Human Rights to carefully and cautiously study these five links:

Of course it might take some hours for the honourable judicial institutions like Swedens Supreme Court and ECHR to study these links. But this is absolutely a necessity in this exceptionally complicated legal case in order to bring clarity to this enormous medical scandal where a false narrative ”ayslum seeking adults never commit assault/abuse on there own children” ruled in Sweden for more than two decades. This false narrative created by Swedish Public Service dominated the debate in Sweden related to the nowadays world famous epidemic of Swedens thousands of apathetic/resignated refugee children.

In first link you find a well written article in English wikipedia that mention the applicant in this appeal, myself, as first person of this nuanced text. A text that never would be published in Swedish wikipedia. However, sometimes I wonder wether some Swedish journalists that I know want the truth to come out, these journalists actually do exist in Sweden risking their careers, have contributed to this text.

In second link there is general information by BBC year 2017 that no one can explain the epidemic. This is not true as the Socialdemocratic govermental State Investigation SOU 2006:49 on page 26 referring to the applicant i.e. myself tells that the apathetic refugee children might be victims of a malingering by proxy situation. Malingering by Proxy is abbreviated MAL-BP. MAL-BP is not a diagnosis but is internationally described as a crime. In Sweden it took the form of crimes against refugee children that were extra vulnerable as the children did not know the language, did not have any contacts with adults except their own family/caretakers that abused them, who coerced them to silence and immobility month after month, in same cases year after year. An utterly tragic situation that according to some people with insight still is ongoing in Sweden because Swedish authorites still cant admit any wrongdoing or confessing being part of a previously (not so today) unanimous establishment that blamed everyone that tried to raise concern for suffering from xenophobia or being political extremists.

Third link is an article I got published in an Australian bioethical journal after some years of lobbying. Swedish and European papers refused to publish articles that opened up for child abuse that critisized Sweden.

Fourth link is the Socialdemocratic governmental investigation where you can read about the applicants point of view on page 26 i.e. a MAL-BP situation, caused by a group of adults, which creates an exceptionally difficult, complex, painful and anxiety provoking staged situation. For some children an extremely painful situation depending on the cruelty of the abusers. All this because adults knew that if their child is very ill it increases their chances to get asylum in Sweden – in other words adult perpetrators with intent made their children severely ill and these perpetrators got support in their evil deeds from Swedish politicians, courts and Karolinska Institute. Of course these Swedish institutions do everthing to silence myself.

Fifth link is a summary by the doctor named Karl Sallin that Karolinska Institute selected to do the research on the epidemic when no professor wanted to get close to the medical hoax. Sallin was rewarded a PhD which he accepted even though it came from Karolinska Institute that for years told the world they had discovered a new illness which in reality was consequences of severe child torture.

In other words children were in fact medically tortured for months and years caused by fake information from their caretakers or parents that lured health staff including doctors into a trap to play along in this cruel theater with fake tube feeding, coerced mutism, coerced immobility, children restricted to stay immobile in beds. I will comment more about this article by Karl Sallin at the end of this appeal.

Fatal misquotation

This court case is about how FAKE NEWS from Swedish State Television and Swedish State Radio labelled me ”The governmental expert” even though I did not have any contact with the investigation which just referred to an article I had written that Swedish State Television and Swedish State Radio, including the accused in this appeal, misquoted. A misquotation that caused a tragedy among refugees in Sweden with thousands of extra vulnerable refugee children as victims AND explains how Swedish legal authorities judgements and Karolinska Institutes so called research failed to give the children rectification.

Details in short:

Undersigned worked year 2006 in Great Britain as consultant psychiatrist and was well aware of the concept of Malingering by Proxy also called Induced or Fabricated Illness in Children which is an utmost tragic situation where children are medically abused by caretakers for caretakers own benefits.

According to my regulatory body General Medical Councils – (where I still am registered no 6026756 even though I moved to Norway anno 2012 and therefore have not revalidated as I would have done if I had stayed in UK. Anyway I was on the specialist register until 2014) – Guidelines I MUST react if I suspect Malingering by Proxy. So, I wrote an article about medical child abuse and Group Malingering by Proxy and the article got published in Dagens Medicin 18th of January 2006. This article was then without me knowing it referred to in a State Investigation SOU 2006:49 that was initiated by at the time governing Socialdemocratic/Labour Party.

The state investigation explained on page 26 the term Group Malingering by Proxy and explicitly told that caretakers together could encourage or coerce children into a pattern of behaviour with a purpose to behave and look as if they suffered from an illness. The consequences of these acts are of course that the children become objects for medical investigations and fake treatments.

And when this medical abuse/assault continues month after month and for some children for years with tube feeding, mutism, threats and physical abuse which is explicitely described by today grown up former child victims, symtoms of extrem anxiety among some children develop during the abuse that for some children has led to catathonic states where the children dissociate because of severe anxiety.

This catathonic end state of medical child abuse the so called researchers at the world famous Karolinska Institute call ”resignation syndrome” without mentioning with a singel word that ”resignation syndrome” is caused by severe medical child abuse like threats and caretakers physical abuse about which now young adult former apathetic children tell that they e.g. were physically beaten in the neck so visiting Swedish health care team should not see the bruises when the child was lying on his back. Source: The book by investigating journalist mr. Ola Sandstig titled ”Apatiska barnen – och samhället som svek” which means ”The Apathetic Children- and the society that betrayed them.” The book and documentary articles about the children with so called resignation syndrome rewarded Ola Sandstig the Golden Spade from Swedish Association of Investigative Journalism. Sandstig mention myself on six pages as the doctor that ”comes closest to the truth”.

If mr Sandstig had written about myself ”the doctor that was spot on” the book could not have been published because Mr Sandstig and his publisher Mondial Publishing LTD would then have been the objects for immense hate and ostracized from Swedish society and probably threatened from Swedish authorities, from Swedish media companies and others that for years thought they were doing something good for the resignated children just to wake up and realize that they instead had supported violent criminals that severly abused children with a purpose to help asylum seekers to get asylum in Sweden.

The only way the Karolinska Institute can save the reputation of the Nobel Prize in medicine is that they today give a thorough, honest, humble declaration that they themselves got lost in some variant of medical masspsychosis. When I whistleblow anno 2006 I critisized a group of researchers at Karolinska Institute that had the institutes mandate to do research on these children. The two leading researchers were a Freudian psychoanalyst respectively an expert on dyslexia. I heard from other professors at the Karolinska Institutet, where I by the way had my own medical education and I know quite a few professors there, that they secretely laughed at this psychoanalyst and at the dyslexia expert. But these other professors did not dare to raise concern as it was a very strong narrative in Sweden that everyone that did not take information from asylumseekers at face value were regarded as suffering from xenophobia or being right wing extremist, branded so by Swedish State Television and Swedish State Radio.

There exist big similarities between Swedens epidemic of resignated children and UK:s

Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal where it took years for anyone that raised concern to get public space. But Swedens silence is, if possible, much much worse at least combined with time span of over two decades and that everyone in Sweden heard and knew about these children but no one dared to raise concern due to fear of being labelled racist or worse.

So, in Sweden when I whistleblew about Group Malingering by Proxy I became a classical victim of the phenomenon ”Shoot the whistleblower” and totally ousted from the debate. That my opinion survived was thanks to political far right groups that supported me, probably because they did not want more immigrants ? but they also told me that they felt disgust against the Swedish establishment that acted so permissively in this cruel theater.

In evidences presented to Stockholm District Court it is clear that I present that the cause to the resignation syndrome might be ”severe medical child abuse”. But Swedish Courts accept that State Television and State Radio present this as ”children that act ill”. Why?

The answer is that the view that I have has by Swedish State Television and Swedish State Radio for decades consistently been distorted and published as: ”Dr Jackson says that the children are acting ill, that they are not ill but just pretending to be ill”.

And its totally impossible for me whatever I do to amend this, I have complained to media in writings, letters and emails and four times taken Swedish media to court to get Swedish media to agree that they have misquoted me. But according to Swedish law a jury consisting of 9 politicians act as judges in media cases like this. In other words the politicians that I blame and critisize for disposing tax payers money to medical child abuse of course dont appreciate my allegations against them, so they become biased and seem to make it impossible for me to fairly raise concerns about the children. This has been true also for other whistleblowers that were publically labelled xenophobics or liers by Swedish media when they raised concern. And it is hopeless to try to get publishing media sentenced for defamation in a court where political instigators of the child abuse are the jurymembers.

I have taken Swedish State Television and Swedish State Radio to the court two times for severe defamation as they continue year after year to publically totally misquote me and expose my person for disgust from the public. But its impossible to get Public Service sentenced. I really dont know for sure all the reasons why the jury refuses to sentence Public Service but one reason probably is that the scandal is too big and might lead to enormous consequences for Swedens international reputation and also for the Nobel Prize as Karolinska Institute for the period of 2004-2019 described severe child abuse as ”WE HAVE DISCOVERED A NEW ILLNESS”.

In addition Swedish State Television (SVT) and Swedish State Radio (SR) depicted myself as a right wing extremist and a nazi although I at that moment was a member of the Conservative Party in England and a member of the Liberal party in Sweden but these facts were well hidden by SVT and SR.

So the socialdemocratic state investigation SOU 2006:49 that told the truth about the epidemic of severe child abuse where I was referred to as a medical expert was severely compromised by Public Service in September 2006. In September 2006 also a general election took place, the Socialdemocrats lost and Sweden got a new conservativ government that I suppose because of political gains chose to regard the Socialdemocratic investigation as a nazi product. The result was that the epidemic of child abuse that for a period during year 2006 had ceased restarted.

Everyone in the Swedish political, scientific, legal and bureaucratic society and perhaps most of all responsible journalists at SVT and SR know that if the full truth comes out about Sweden, and how its legal institutions and the prestigious institute selecting Nobel Prize winner Karolinska Institutet labelled severe child abuse as an illness, they all will be scandalized and become a tragic laughing stock for the whole world. So they actually seem to regard their own prestige as more important than the childrens sad fate -so they actually let children continue to suffer!

Today 16th of January 2026 you can read this on Karolinska Institutes website:

https://ki.se/en/gph/research/research-groups-at-gph/children-with-resignation-syndrome

” Children with resignation syndrome In 1999, some children in asylum seeking families in Sweden showed severe reduction in function, including pervasive refusal to eat, drink, walk, talk or care for themselves.

In 2014 this was to be named the resignation syndrome (ICD-10 F32.3A). Our studies now studying long term outcomes in this group.”

Sweden has a unique system for Freedom of Speech and Freedom of the Press and Swedes are very proud of the Freedom of the Press Act as this is usually regarded the first law of of Freedom of the Press dated back as early as December 2nd 1766. Of course the law has gone through changes over the years. Anyway, one essential feature is often critisized namely that the jury consists of politicians. This is probably one of the causes why the children dont get any rectification or financial damages for the state funded severe abuse/torture they have gone through. This when the Swedish state for more than two decades paid health staff to insert gastric tubes on thousends of mutistic refugee children and some lost 20-30% of their body weight because the Swedish state let caretakers tubefeed them which in many cases they did not do.

English wikipedia tries to describe this tragedy with nuances and my name is mentioned first of anyone elses although thousends of doctors, politicians and journalists have been involved and Netflix made a FAKE documentary about the children that was Oscar-nominated. An astonishing fact is that only radical right wing politicians gave support to the Socialdemocratic state investigation SOU 2006:49.

This of course did not support the findings of the Socialdemocratic investigation and might be one reason why the Conservative government under Fredrik Reinfeldt threw the Socialdemocratic investigation into a wastebag.

The Conservative Party permanented the child abuse. It took until 2019 when under exceptional resistence from the Swedish establishment two journalists namely Mattias Göransson and Ola Sandstig published interviews with now grown up former ”resignated refugee children” that told about the serious abuse they went through for years, how desparate they were and that they suffered so much in the MAL-BP situation that they wanted to commit suicide. This abuse was funded by Swedish tax payers money. The now grown up former children told ”why why why did no one react, they must have understood what was going on as they were educated health staff”.

The answer to this exceptional sad and tragic question is that everyone that tried to raise concern was labelled extremist or nazi by the Swedish Press with the result that politicians and the court system, to put it straightforward, did not dare to object to this ruling narrative.

The result was that severe child abuse in Sweden continued for years. As I am fairly well known in Sweden middle management staff at Swedens Wellfare Authority Försäkringskassan told me some years ago that although the epidemic is almost gone they are still paying millions of SEK to what they suppose are criminal caretakers that get money for tube feeding their children. Some cases of abuse on resignated children have been published, this might be top of the iceberg, even when these cases are published Swedish authorities dont seem to care – probably because of fear to open Pandoras box. I guess they simply dont know what to do. If some civil servants told the truth ”we have Auschwitz 2.0 in Sweden” they would not get any public space, they would be fired and ostracized like myself.

I write this appeal to the Swedish Supreme Court in English as to make them aware of the seriousness of their judicial neglect which already has had international consequences as some copycats of induced resignation syndrome have spread over the world especially in Sydney Australia where the scam have been reproduced.

Its absolutely hopeless to get the Swedish judicial system to admit that I have been misquoted by SVT and SR and that this has resulted in an enormous medical scam and scandal where in the most severe cases the pain and anxiety among these extra vulnerable children without doubt can be compared to suffering of children victims of doctor Mengele activities in Auschwitz concentration camp.

That this abuse de facto have taken place is now accepted among pediatricians and many journalists but not by the Swedish Authorities and the legal system.

The Board of Swedish Doctors Association gave expert witness evidence in court case B 15812-16 at Stockholm District Court April 2018 that ”Dr Jackson has done nothing wrong when he wrote his opinion”. After this some pediatricians told publically about the medical abuse that they were lured to perform and prescribe irrelevant treatments and that they because of political correctness were coerced to perform medical abuse on refugee children. But still, no reaction comes from reponsible authorities.

In short: The Swedish State is paralytic in this issue. Probably because the scandal is too big and all establishment including journalists, politicians, health managers, judges that for years took part in misquoting myself and obstructing my legal rights and who instigated medical abuse of children dont want to hear the truth.

In Norway the authorites did exactly what I recommended i.e. separateD the children from adults. And the few cases of resignated children that arrived in Norway from Sweden got well after some weeks. But in Sweden they were de facto tortured for months and years.

The Norwegian vice chancellor year 2017-2023 Ole Petter Ottersen at Karolinska Institutet is too to some part involved in giving legitimacy to the abuse but at least he tried to raise concern. When this failed he soon resigned from his position as vice Chancellor at Karolinska Institute. He is in a problematic situation as he has to a reasonable extent be loyal with Karolinska institute but I believe he should be heard in a Human Rights Court.

The only hope for the children that now still are under medical abuse, coerced to tube feeding, threats and to lie in a bed being treated by criminal caretakers paid by Swedish tax payers money – is ECHR.

If ECHR dont react these victims of Malingering by Proxy/Medical Abuse probably will be medical slaves under severe torture for decades to come until they die.

I the applicant to ECHR mean that the Swedish State in this exceptionally dark and tragic epidemic in Sweden of medically abused refugee children has in more than one aspect showed severe contempt and neglect for fundamental human rights.

The Swedish state has broken several Articles in the European Convention for Human Rights:

Article 3: ”No one should be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment”.

Comment: Can neglecting an epidemic of Medical Child Abuse of the kind that took place in Sweden year 1998-2025 and still to this very day may restrain children/young adults to beds and coerced tube feeding be sorted as a breach under this article 3?

Article 10: 1. ”Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority”.

Comment: I, dr Thomas G.A. Jackson, raised concern already year 2006, see link 4 above, that the epidemic of children with resignation syndrome that at that time year 2006 had been ongoing for 8 years might be nothing else than to put it bluntly ”severe child abuse”.

These are the exact words I wrote in a debate article 18th January 2006 referred to in the state investigation SOU 2006:49. Swedish State Television interferred totally with my message that the children were severely abused, Swedish State Television not only totally hid the term Malingering by Proxy from being discussed publically, they even published a total lie for Swedish public namely ”Dr Jackson states the the children only pretend to be ill”. I urge to ECHR in this extraordinary case to equate tax funded Swedish State Television with public authority and that they therefore are guilty of breaching article 10 by interferring and publically twisting my concerns to the opposite compared to what I in reality told.

Article 10: 2. ”The exercise of these freedoms……..for the protection of the reputations or rights ot others.

Comment: Swedish State Television and Swedish State Radio publically on television and on radio reaching everyone in Sweden deliberately misquoated myself and totally destroyed my reputation as a medical doctor making it impossible for me to work in UK, Norway and Sweden. This even though I had for 30 years 1977-2006 flawlessly worked as a medical doctor in UK, Sweden and Norway.

Article 14 Prohibition of discriminating. ”The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status.

Comment: My assesment iswhen Swedish State Television (SVT) and Swedish State Radio (SR) publically all over Sweden branded me as a nazi and right wing extremist and refused me public space to respond (at the time I was a member of Liberal Party in Sweden and the Conservatives in UK) this meant that I literally was regarded as a nazi wherever I turned in Sweden. Swedish State Television and Swedish Radio thought it suited their narrative perfectly that the state investigation SOU 2006:49 was heavily influenced by ”right wing extremists like Dr Jackson”. ”Never change a good story” is their Credo. And it surely was a good story that the mysterious resignation epidemic among asylum seeking families children was caused by Swedens inhumane immigration laws inspired by nazis.

Anyway, according to article 14 the Swedish Court has an obligation to treat me without discrimination.

Comment: I firmly believe that I am discriminated against when Swedish legal courts consistently rule that it is not defamation when media lie about my person and my opinion that children are medically abused AND DENY ME THE RIGHT TO HAVE WITNESSES IN COURT HEARINGS. It is media itself that has branded me as a nazi, as a totally incompetent nazi doctor that believes that resignated children are just acting, as a heartless person without empathy for children and disguised as a doctor. Swedish media have never given me any opportunity to respond publically to deny these nazi allegations and to tell that I firmly believe that the children are severly abused and not acting. Swedish media has in a total contempt for the truth put the word ”acting” in my mouth because it suited their narrative. And furthermore now Swedish Courts even deny me to have relevant witness hearings in their legal courts.

After being for twenty years publically described as a nazi and in vain having tried to tell public service and other national media plus four times I have taken media to court and appealed several times to Supreme Court that I am not a nazi and that it is illegal to call a Christian conservative well educated doctor that tries to raise concern about child abuse for nazi. But I today have to accept that I will forever be viewed as a nazi in Sweden.

But even a nazi doctor has the right to not be discriminated against when he sacrifices his career and financial wellbeing to save refugee children from abuse.

In summary: That the unique and cruel copycat epidemic with severe child abuse could continue in Sweden after year 2006 is totally caused by discrimination against me and the message I published in a debate article January 18th 2006.

In this article I clearly stated the epidemic of resignated children that started already year 1998 and then year 2006 had lasted for eight years might be severe child abuse.

This debate article made many Swedish professors, politicians and journalists extremely upset and aggressive against me who acted as a whistleblower.

These professionals had namely until then for years been interviewed in TV-sofas, radio programs and given public space wherever they wanted to discuss their theories about this newly discovered illness among asylumseeking refugee children.

And then all of a sudden an average adult psychiatrist working in UK appeared on the scene blaming them for not discussing if child abuse can explain the tragic epidemic.

Of course they got angry. And together they shot the whistleblower.

Leeds/UK 17th January 2026.

Jackson Jagar Journalister och Jurister

Terapiforum för journalist - och juristskadade

Swedish Politicians, Judges and Journalists discussed in Swedens Supreme Court